Previous Entry | Next Entry

turtle
Phyllida and the Brotherhood of Philander: A Bisexual Regency Romance, Ann Herendeen.

The copy I have was published by AuthorHouse [self-pub], but the author's website notes, "Phyllida will be coming out as a Harper Paperback in summer 2008." I'm wondering if the Harper version will be edited down, as the original is quite a brick, and involves a number of standard plots [the Big Misunderstanding, the Virgin's Awakening/Man Gets a Clue, Spies for the French!, Woman Finds Her Backbone!, Adorable SubPlot Couples, SubPlot Villain Redeemed! (sort of)] that might be broken out into separate books. It's fun as a brick, though. All those plot standards had to be present in order to be subverted. Subversions happen with varying degrees of success.



The male protagonist, Andrew, belongs to a club called The Brotherhood of Philander, a safe space for its gay members not only to indulge in homosexual sex but to "be themselves." Sodomy is against the law in Regency England, and requires a degree of secrecy which the author acknowledges, but at many points the needs of the romance conveniently overlook this, as when Andrew, supposedly notorious as a sodomite, seems to have no trouble getting into any social gathering he likes. I was okay with that; I didn't want to read a depressing book, after all.

Andrew needs an heir, so decides to marry a woman, but he wants the woman to know about his proclivities and allow him to continue having male lovers. Phyllida, well-bred but poor, and incidentally a writer of smutty Gothic romance, is introduced by a friend of Andrew's. For a while, the story proceeds much like any other arranged marriage Regency on the "bad sex then good sex" axis, with the addition of some amusing moments in which Andrew's brother tries to explain the clitoris to him ("the little man in the boat"). Once good sex is achieved, Big Misunderstandings begin to fall from the sky. Most of them, I attribute to Andrew, who like many Alpha Male Heroes, can be a selfish prick, and is rather shockingly (and realistically) scornful of women and the poor at several points. I found his imperfections one of the book's good points. I liked very much that he wasn't Practically Perfect In Every Way.

Andrew's longtime lover, a soldier, breaks it off with him by mail, but not too long after, Andrew hooks up with Matthew, who in Big Misunderstanding #2, pretends to have less money than he actually does. Not nearly as much time is spent on Andrew and Matthew; they initially share the same expectations to a much greater degree than Andrew and Phyllida. Phyllida and Matthew form a strong friendship, but alas Matthew does not seem interested in women at all; this doesn't stop Andrew from being jealous, of course, at least until the end. I liked Matthew a lot better than Andrew.

Edited to add: I didn't say as much about Phyllida's role because she more closely follows standard romance tropes. Her writing is an issue between her and Andrew, and I think it's a commentary on genre, as well; I wasn't totally satisfied with the issue's resolution. Her intersection with the villain was promising, but I felt it petered out somewhat and didn't resolve in an interesting way, either.

I liked the male prostitute (probably straight) who ends up marrying and getting out of the business. I also liked the female character who turns out to look better in men's clothing.

Things that particularly annoyed me: Phyllida's pregnancy or nonpregnancy is drawn out far, far too long. Also, far too many people seem to care whether Andrew can impregnate her and bring the question up in conversation, when we the readers know from early on that he's perfectly capable. Also I found the villain boring and too terribly convenient at various plot moments.

It's worth a read; I'd love to see a romance scholar deconstruct this.

Comments

( 13 comments — Leave a comment )
[info]buymeaclue wrote:
May. 7th, 2007 09:03 pm (UTC)
And does Phyllida get to have some on the side, too?
[info]mswyrr wrote:
May. 8th, 2007 04:20 am (UTC)
Probably not. An Alpha would never tolerate the possibility of the heroine's womb (which he bought and paided for by marriage) growing a child that isn't his, oh no.

(I hate Alphas, even when they're part of oppressed groups.)

[info]oracne wrote:
May. 8th, 2007 12:16 pm (UTC)
Alas, no...I should note that in my comments.
[info]keilexandra wrote:
May. 7th, 2007 09:54 pm (UTC)
Your review makes it seem like the book is mostly about Andrew, yet the title implies Phyllida as a main character--which is it?
[info]oracne wrote:
May. 8th, 2007 12:18 pm (UTC)
Phyllida actually gets quite a lot to do, but I had less to complain about in her plot! Her writing is a major issue, and the subplot with the villain is part of the Big Misunderstanding.
[info]annesible wrote:
May. 8th, 2007 03:39 am (UTC)
Could you post a link to the author's website?
[info]oracne wrote:
May. 8th, 2007 12:18 pm (UTC)
[info]geekturnedvamp wrote:
May. 8th, 2007 05:27 am (UTC)
Oh, it desperately needs to be edited, but I'm so glad it's getting picked up by a mainstream publisher as that is good news for bisexual romances in general! Anyway, the author is on LJ and her website is http://www.annherendeen.com/.
[info]daedala wrote:
May. 9th, 2007 02:19 am (UTC)
Yay bi romances! I will definitely get this one.

I should finish mine.
[info]daedala wrote:
Aug. 6th, 2008 05:23 pm (UTC)
ok now I need to rant a little
Ok, I did finally get this, and I liked it enough to read it until it was far, far too late at night; I woke up with ten minutes to get ready this morning.

But it drove me nuts in a lot of ways. The French Spy plot seemed stupid and boring (I may have been too tired to make sense of it; at least it was the male characters who were Too Stupid to Live in this one), they seemed to behave very inappropriately in public despite the claims of discretion, and I would have liked to strangle the cutsey old men.

However, the thing that makes me kind of angry is the way Andrew is presented in the beginning as gay, gay, gay, but he falls for Phyllida almost instantly. It seems to be a slight update of the whole "the love of a good woman will cure you!" thing; I don't like it better when the orientation changes from gay to bi as opposed to gay to straight. If he had been presented as bi from the beginning, it wouldn't bother me, but he pretty clearly had zero interest in or knowledge of women (besides that one chambermaid or whatever) before he met her.

Also, the Jane Austen misunderstanding just irritated the hell out of me.
[info]oracne wrote:
Aug. 11th, 2008 02:35 pm (UTC)
Re: ok now I need to rant a little
It was definitely flawed. I would rather have had the bi thing more clearly at the beginning.
[info]daedala wrote:
Aug. 11th, 2008 06:55 pm (UTC)
Re: ok now I need to rant a little
I think the book hit a couple of my pet peeves. It's not the author's fault I have those particular ones, though.
[info]barbarienne wrote:
May. 8th, 2007 06:20 pm (UTC)
The folks at Harper seem to be assuming it will be "540" pages (nice trick, that, since it's not a signature break).
( 13 comments — Leave a comment )

Profile

turtle
[info]oracne
oracne - Victoria Janssen
Victoria Janssen

Latest Month

November 2009
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     
Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Tiffany Chow